If AI work keeps expanding, decide what will finish before you open the tool.
This system is for people using AI to write, research, plan or build. It gives the session a purpose, a time limit, a revision limit and a clear stopping point.
I built it after entering AI sessions without a clear plan, asking for version after version and watching hours disappear while very little reached another person.
AI can keep producing. You have to decide when the work is useful enough to stop.
The short version to keep beside your computer
- Choose when AI work begins. Stay offline from AI until that time.
- Before every AI session, write the goal and finished outcome offline.
- Choose a time limit and a revision limit before you start.
- When AI gets the work close, take it offline and finish it yourself.
- Choose when AI and online work end for the day.
- Set a real completion date before starting the project.
- Define good enough before opening AI, not after the work begins.
The full protocol
Choose when AI work begins
Do not let the first notification or unfinished thought decide when you start. Choose a time that protects sleep, meals, exercise, family or quiet thinking. My own AI work begins at 11 a.m., but the useful boundary is the one that fits your life.
Write the brief before opening the tool
On paper, answer: What am I building? Who is it for? What must the finished result do? What does good enough look like? When will it ship? Which examples does AI need?
Set the end before you start
Choose a time limit and a revision limit. Ask for one complete result. If the work still misses after the allowed correction, fix the brief or finish the task yourself.
Finish the human part offline
Take the useful material away from the screen. Add your voice, instinct, judgement and lived experience. AI provides scaffolding. You decide what stays.
Ship on the date you chose before starting
The shipping date is not when the work feels perfect. It is a real date written down before the AI session begins.
End the working day away from AI
Close the tool at a chosen time. Walking, exercise, meditation, cooking or time with people gives your attention a chance to settle before the next session.
A prompt that gives the work a finish
I am creating [project] for [audience]. The finished result is [outcome] in [format]. It is good enough when [criteria]. Use these examples: [links or files]. Give me one complete result for this task. Do not add related tasks.
Why the system produces better AI work
AI can be extremely capable without knowing what matters to you
It can organise, draft, compare, calculate and generate useful possibilities. It does not know your purpose, standards or acceptable trade-offs unless you supply that judgement.
A vague brief creates vague work
The clearer you are about the audience, outcome, examples, format and length, the easier the output is to judge.
A revision limit exposes a weak brief
If the work still misses after the correction you allowed, stop. Clarify the audience, outcome or examples instead of continuing an unfocused conversation.
AI needs examples, not just adjectives
Words such as warm, clear and human are too broad. Real emails, articles, templates and customer language show the tool what those words mean.
AI can structure the work without taking responsibility for it
It can build a useful structure and assemble a draft. It cannot verify your experience, choose your standards or accept the consequences of what you publish.
Time-boxing is part of the method
Without a limit, every output creates another possible task. A timer and a hard finish protect the work from becoming a trance.
The sequence matters
Think first. Use AI to research or challenge the idea. Choose the structure. Build a first draft. Finish the human part offline. Use one cleanup pass only when needed.
Your experience gives the output something real to contain
The advantage is not producing more words. It is adding real examples, relevant judgement and results that did not come from a model.
Bottom line
Fix the brief. Set the date. Ship.
You do not need an endless AI session to earn permission to publish. You need a clear finish and the willingness to let the work meet real people.
See every AI Sanity article →
Michael has spent much of his working life online, and much of the rest of it trying to stop technology from taking over. He writes about what helped, what failed and how to keep the useful parts of digital life.